
4 Jun 2026

For What Comes Next.
The introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures under the Corporations Act and Australian Sustainability Reporting Standard 2 – Climate-related Disclosures (AASB S2) represents a significant shift in expectations. For many organisations, this isn’t just about compliance, it’s about understanding how climate risks and opportunities impact long-term performance.
So, what does this mean in practice, and how should businesses be thinking about it?
From 1 January 2025, Australia’s mandatory climate reporting regime began rolling out for large entities, with further phases bringing more organisations into scope over time.
At the centre of this is AASB S2 Climate-related Disclosures, which requires businesses to disclose information about climate-related risks and opportunities that could affect cash flows, access to finance, or cost of capital.
These disclosures sit alongside the financial statements as part of an entity’s annual reporting suite and are subject to increasing levels of scrutiny and assurance over time.
Importantly, this is not just a compliance exercise. The intent is to provide decision-useful information to investors and stakeholders about how climate factors influence business value.
While the initial focus is on larger organisations, the impact is much broader.
Although some entities may not be directly required to prepare a sustainability report, here are the reasons why you should be ready:
As a result, many SMEs and not-for-profits are being indirectly drawn into the reporting ecosystem. They are being, or soon will be, asked questions that they haven’t traditionally had to answer:
At its core, climate reporting under AASB S2 aligns with four key pillars:
This structure is based on the global International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) framework and is designed to create consistency and comparability across markets.
For many businesses, the biggest shift is linking this information back to financial outcomes.
From our experience, there are some common pitfalls.
Treating sustainability as a reporting exercise
Many organisations focus on producing a report, rather than embedding sustainability into strategy. This can result in disclosures that look polished but lack substance.
Poor data quality and ownership
Sustainability data often sits across different parts of the business and lacks clear ownership, leading to inconsistencies and reliability issues.
Ignoring the value chain
emissions remain one of the most complex areas, with many businesses underestimating or excluding supply chain impacts.
Underestimating the effort involved
Implementing robust processes, controls and governance frameworks takes significantly more time and coordination than many initially expect.
While compliance is the immediate driver, there are broader implications:
Better risk management
Climate risks, both physical (e.g. extreme weather) and transition-related (e.g. regulation, changing customer sentiment), are increasingly impacting operations and financial performance.
Access to capital
Investors and lenders are using climate disclosures to assess risk and allocate capital e.g. “green” loans.
Competitive advantage
Organisations that can clearly articulate their sustainability position are often better placed in tenders.
Stronger governance
The requirement to disclose governance processes is driving more robust oversight and accountability at board level.
For organisations at the early stages, the key is to avoid overcomplicating the first steps.
A practical approach often includes:
Starting early is critical, both to manage compliance risk and to embed sustainability into decision-making.
Climate and sustainability reporting is not just another regulatory requirement; it reflects a broader shift in how businesses are assessed and valued.
Those that approach it as a strategic opportunity, rather than a compliance burden, are likely to be better positioned in the years ahead.
Navigating climate and sustainability reporting can feel complex, particularly as requirements continue to evolve and expectations increase across regulators, investors and stakeholders.
If you’re unsure where to start, or want to sense check your current approach, we’re here to help.
Nick Bromell and Fiona Gordon, Audit Directors at Perks, both have experience with supporting organisations across a range of industries as they prepare for and respond to climate-related disclosure requirements. Nick and Fiona hold the Certificate in Climate-related Disclosures issued by Chartered Accountants Australia & New Zealand, providing a strong technical foundation combined with practical, audit-driven insight.
If you have any questions or would like to discuss how these changes may impact your organisation, please feel free to reach out to Nick or Fiona.
Contact
Get in touch and we’ll connect you with the right Adviser for your needs
